Every four years America is encounters the arduous process of electing a
president to office. What makes this process so difficult is trying to sift
through the candidate's speeches in search of their true views on the issues.
Most of what is said is usually words and phrases meant to appeal to the
audience, but lack true meaning and promise. Well with this last debate, I
viewed a muddy conversation that was filled with much finger pointing, but
little true discussion about the issues. Because of this, I am going to try to
outline and identify how the candidates stand on the important issues of this
2012 election.
This first debate focused on the Domestic Issues of America. As the candidates
walked into frame and greeted each other with a firm handshake and bright
smiles, I knew that this debate was going to be filled with drama. On a side
bar, I always want to know what the candidates say to each other during their
greeting and departure at the beginning and end of the debates. Are they truly
nice to each other, or is that when they talk smack to their competitor? It
would be interesting to be a fly on the wall during that moment.
Anyways, back to the debate, President Obama and Romney started the debate
by outlining how they would address job creation for America. With the economy
emerging for one of the most troubling economic times in recent history, a
large number of Americans (myself included) are having troubles finding a job
and retaining it for an extended period of time. Obama addressed this issue
first by saying that during his administration 5 million jobs have been created
for American citizens. Obama continued by describing how he desires to invest
in education and training classes available at community colleges. This would
be accomplished through programs like his Race to the Top program that strive
to improve skills of the student, resources for the students, and create
teaching jobs. If he were to be able to do this, Obama believes that it would
spur the economy by providing more qualified workers to be hired. Additionally,
Obama said that he would support changing the tax code in order to help small
businesses. He desires to lower the corporate tax rate to 25% for manufacturing
companies while also closing loopholes for companies that send jobs overseas.
Obama said he would provide tax breaks to companies that invested in domestic
growth. He wishes to go back to the tax rates held during the Clinton
administration, when America last had a surplus.
Romney outlined how he would address job creation in a five-part plan.
First, Romney said he would support and encourage the US becoming energy
independent. Next, he would open trade in Latin America and China creating more
outlets for business opportunities. Thirdly, Romney would make sure that people
have good education skills and better ranking schools available nationwide to
foster the economic growth. Then, Romney would get the US to a balanced budget.
Lastly, Romney said he would champion small businesses to create more jobs for
the everyday American. Romney agreed with Obama, and said that he desires to
provide tax relief to the middle class. It was pointed out, however, that
Romney's plan for compensating for tax cuts by closing loopholes and deductions
is not realistic, and that it would actually add $2000 more to the middle class
tax burden.
The debate then continued on to the issue of federal debt. Romney began this
section of the debate by saying that he thought of debt as a moral issue. It
should not be the desire of a moral person to spend more money than they have
available, and then pass the debt of their economic errors down to the younger
generation. Romney outlined the common sense three step method to fix the
federal debt: raise taxes, cut spending, and expand the economy. Romney said
his test for reformatting the economy would be to ask himself whether or not a
program in question was worth borrowing money from another country to finance.
If it does not pass this question, then Romney would get rid of the program. He
also said that he would take different programs, and if they can be run at the
state level, would move them there. Thus, in Romney's eyes, he would make the
US government more efficient by combining programs and cutting the number of
employees.
Obama explained his method of dealing with national debt by first saying
that when he entered office, he inherited a huge debt from two wars being paid
on a credit card, tax cuts, and programs unpaid for during an economic crisis.
Obama then said that he restricted 77 programs, cutting $1 trillion from the
budget, and put forth a $4 trillion deficit reduction plan. {I cannot guarantee
that these statements are totally true. There has been a lack of fact checking
during this election.}
The debate then turned to the issue of entitlements. Obama ensured people
that the government knows the necessity of social security and Medicare for
elderly people nationwide, and that these two benefits are strengthened by not
overpaying insurance companies. Obama also said that the money set aside for
social security and Medicare is used to decrease the medication costs and
hospital fees. However, Obama did not address the fact that the probability of
social security and Medicare being available for younger generations is
extremely low.
Romney, on the other hand, is not proposing any changes to the current
social security or Medicare systems, but is offering an optional alternative
for people to select if desired. Romney said that every time Obama decreases
the amount of money given to insurance companies and hospitals, the number of people
that can be treated decreases because of the lower funds available. Therefore,
Romney and Ryan proposed a voucher program, called Premium Support, in which a
voucher is given to a person so that they can get insurance no matter their
health status. Through this program, however, there is the possibility that Medicare
could in fact collapse, due to accumulated costs, putting seniors at the mercy
of private insurance companies after all. The voucher program still keeps the
option open for younger people if they have no other way of obtaining
insurance.
Then, the hot button issue of healthcare/Obamacare was hit upon. Romney
began by making it clear that he supported the repeal of the Affordable Care
Act. He proclaimed that Obamacare would in fact cost more money than
traditional insurance costs putting more of a strain upon the American
citizens. Romney also did not like how Obamacare puts in place an unelected
board that tells people what kind of treatment they will be allowed. Romney
also cited that 75% of small businesses said that under Obamacare, they are
less likely to be able to offer their workers insurance. Romney believes that a
healthcare plan needs to be crafted at the state level in order to suit the
state's needs individually. He believes that if a healthcare plan is enacted at
the state level, then the problems of the state will be able to be focused on while
decreasing costs to the people. However, Romney was unable to describe how he
will replace Obamacare if he is elected. He was unable to outline any details
and instead said that is was "complicated".
Obama tried to explain the purpose of Obamacare more clearly. First, he said
that if you currently have health insurance, the government would not take
over. You can keep your own healthcare provider and doctor. Obamacare just
tries to make sure that the insurance companies don't take advantage of you and
offer rebates if the company spends more administrative time on your case than
care for you. Secondly, if you do not have health insurance, a group plan is
created through Obamacare that allows you to benefit from group rates 18% lower
than the private market. Obama also clarified the issue of the healthcare board
within Obamacare, stating that it is a group of healthcare experts who
determine how costs can be decreased for the betterment of the public. Romney,
however, did point out that if Obamacare is passed, up to 20 million people
could loose their insurance provider, and 30% of Americans could be dropped
from their coverage. {Fact check this. I do not know if these figures are
correct.}
The debate moved on from here to the issue of the role of government. Obama
gave the presidential response, saying that the government's job is to keep the
American people safe. Obama said the government is also to create opportunity
and gateways for its citizens, while fostering the education of every citizen. Romney
echoed many of these sentiments, quoting parts of the Constitution and
Declaration of Independence. While protecting life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness, Romney said that he would ensure that the American military would be
second to none. Romney also included the idea that the government should
maintain its commitment to religious tolerance and freedom.
Lastly, the candidates talked about the issue of partisan gridlock that the
American government has been experiencing recently. Romney said that he would
sit down with members from each party on his first day in office in order to
discuss issues and challenges that need to be addressed. He said that
throughout his term if elected, he would work on a collaborative basis as he
has done as governor of Massachusetts. This, however, could be a more difficult
task than Romney thinks.
Obama assured the public that he takes ideas from anybody, no matter their
party affiliation. He cited Obamacare, stating that it originally was an idea
from a Republican, and grew through bipartisan efforts. Obama, however,
asserted that sometimes a person has to say "No" and stand up for
their beliefs when it comes to ideas they are passionate about. This shed some
light on the difficulties that the US government has experienced in the past
months between the President and Congress.
With closing remarks from both candidates about how the spirit of the
country inspires them daily, the candidates ended their first debate with
unsure messages. At times, this debate reminded me of a fight between two
teenage girls over a boy they both liked. Due to the bickering and incessant
talking when they were told to stop, Obama and Romney left me more confused at
the end of the debate than I was at the beginning. There are two more debates
between the Presidential candidates and on between the VPs. I will cover all as
non-bias as possible. I hope this helps y'all understand, and if you have any
comments, just post them. Thanks and Gig Em.
Nice summary! Since the debate was going on when it was approximately 2am over here, I wasn't able to watch live. I just got the brief overview from the Daily Show, and I really appreciated you breaking down both candidate's positions. I did feel like some of their ideas for the economy were pretty similar. At times, it even seemed like even the mediator was struggling to differentiate them. I'm looking forward to the upcoming foreign policy debate and will be interested to hear what you personally think about the political climate, especially being in Texas right now!
ReplyDelete